Notes: Kent Online Parish Clerks, Kent Family Garden

Matches 2,501 to 2,550 of 3,417

#	Notes	Linked to
2501	On the very same day as this baptism was the baptism of Elizabeth daughter of John, Esq. and Frances Thomson. This strongly suggests that there is a familial tie between the two families. After further investigation I discovered that the connection was through Frances Thomson, who was his biological sister. John Thomson, Esq. and Frances Thomson were cousins of each other.	THOMSON, Elizabeth ^ (I20080)
2502	On this marriage Mary's surname was written as Rooke but we know from the Will of Simon, her brother that indeed Mary Ruck was the spouse of Jacob Sylver.	RUCK, Marie aka Mary (I5283)
2503	On this second marriage Francis was described as being "of Godmersham" and Elizabeth, as being of "Kingsnorth".	Family (F1855)
2504	One of Cade's rebels June - July 1450 was a Nicholas Stykker a skinner of Smarden. Source: Cade's Followers, p. 263. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Index to British Chancery Records, 1386-1558 Name: John Stykker Place: Kent Date: 1502-1503 Volume: 4 Page: 87 Bundle: 265 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Short title: Igo v Salmon. Plaintiffs: John Igo, son and heir of Alice Igo. Defendants:... Ordering and viewing options This record has not been digitised and cannot be downloaded. You can order records in advance to be ready for you when you visit Kew. You will need a reader's ticket to do this. Or, you can request a quotation for a copy to be sent to you. Order in advance Request a copy Reference: C 1/265/8 Description: Short title: Igo v Salmon. Plaintiffs: John Igo, son and heir of Alice Igo. Defendants: Thomas Salmon and John Stykker, feoffees to uses. Subject: A messuage in Ashford. Kent Date: 1502-1503 Held by: The National Archives, Kew Name: Igo, Alice Dates: 1503 Place: General, England Book: Calendar of Wills and Administrations now preserved in the Probate Registry at Canterbury, 1396-1558 (Will) Collection: England: Canterbury - Wills and Administrations in the Probate Registry at Canterbury, 1396-1558 and 1640-1650 Text: Igo, Alice, widow, Ashford A. 8 252 1502-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Other Stiker marriages that have yet to have the individuals identified: 1st series - Canterbury Marriage Licences by Cowper Stickard Margaret 339 PRICE, William of Bethersden, and Margaret STICKARD, of the same, widow, Jan. 8, 1588. LOTHER, John married STIKER, Susan, 28 Oct 1578 at Bethersden. Source: BT WHATLOW, William married STICARD, Margrit, 1560/61, married on Shrove Evening at Pluckley. Source: AD BAXLEYE, Steven married STYKER, Sara, 08 Nov 1585 at Bethersden. Source: BT ===============================================================================	STIKER OR STYCKER, William (I12293)
2505	One of his children had a son named Randall Daniels who currently lives in Nova Scotia and is signed up for Roots Tech 2022. He shows up in my matches.	DANIELS, Ernest Edward (I20139)
2506	One of the causes of death listed was malarial fever, intermittant.	JEMMETT, William Henry (I4078)
2507	One of the five surviving children of Emmery Milsted and Rebecca (nee Ward), William was the seventh child born. He married on 27 August 1854, Eliza Weller of Canterbury. At that time he was living on Oyster Court in Faversham and he was working as a master mariner. In 1863 his first known child was born: Florence M. at Seasalter. By 1871 William and family, now including two sons - Henry Thomas, born during 1865 and Albert W., born during 1869 - were living at Lime Cottages. William had, since 1861, taken up dredging. This family does not appear on the 1881 census and most likely had moved away from the area.	MILSTED, William (I2689)
2508	One of these two burials relates to this Daniel Dodd: 1791 Oct 14 b . . . . . Daniel at Ashford 1795 Mar 31 b . . . . . Daniel at Ashford	DODD, Daniel (I9330)
2509	One source gives wife of Richard Arderne as being Margaret Greene presumed daughter of Sir Thomas Greene of Northamptonshire. Sussex visitation of 1530, p. 195 shows Richard Arderne marrying Mary, daughter of Thomas Green of West Marne, Sussex. However, the only children listed are: Thomas, George, Richard and Catherine. No daughter Alice is mentioned. Yet, it is Alice Arderne the supposed daughter of Richard Arderne and Margaret Greene who married John Denne.	GREEN, ----PROBLEM---Margaret ===[PROBLEM- (I13190)
2510	Only available on FindMyPast. Transcripts cost GB2.50. Original image of the entry costs GB3.50.	Source (S173)
2511	Only shown in Stammtafeln	Adele (I8310)
2512	Only son and heir.	SADLER, Thomas Leigh (I10734)
2513	Only surviving daughter of Stephen LONG, Esq.	LONG, Mary (I12549)
2514	OR Elizabeth Mathuist Sheppey District, vol. 2a, p. 642, June Qtr 1862	MATHUIST, Eliza Coates (I10966)
2515	Ordained Deacon and Priest the same day by Archbishop's dispensation on 25 April 1562 at Bishop's Manor, London, Great Chapel or Oratory; Vicar of Herne 19 October 1577, later Perpetual Vicar of Herne; Vicar of Monkton 1574-1590; received MA on 24 September 1584 Rector of Harbledown (all in Kent) and Rector of Snave made vacant as of 6 March 1590 by reason of his death during February 1590. Ordination Evidence Detail Linked to person: Bridges, John 1562-1562 CCEd Record ID: 165300 Close Window Evidence Cleric Detail Surname Brydges Forename Johannes Title Qualification University College Year Event Type Type ordination Date 25/4/1562 Place: Bishop's Manor, London, Church: Great Chapel or Oratory Clerical Status: deacon Letters Dimissory No Source Guildhall Library, 9535/1 Bishop Grindal, Edmund/London 1559-1570 Description No further details. Ordained deacon and priest the same day by Archbishop's dispensation. -------------------------- Ordination Evidence Detail Linked to person: Bridges, John 1562-1562 CCEd Record ID: 165312 Close Window Evidence Cleric Detail Surname Bridges Forename Johannes Title Qualification University College Year Event Type Type ordination Date 25/4/1562 Place Bishop's Manor, London Church Great Chapel or Oratory Clerical Status priest Letters Dimissory No Source Guildhall Library, 9535/1 Bishop Grindal, Edmund/London 1559-1570 Description Ordained deacon and priest the same day by Archbishop's dispensation. ---------------------- Liber Cleri Detail Linked to person: Bridges, Johannes 1577-1590 View Full Liber Cleri Record CCEd Record ID: 151064 Close Window Evidence Cleric Detail Surname Brydge Forename Johannes Title Magister Qualification Event Type Date: 19/10/1577 Office/Status: Vicar Location: Herne / Source CCA, DCb X.8.6 (Liber Cleri): 1577 Ordinary / Jurisdiction Grindal, Edmund/Canterbury 1576-1583 Description ----------------------------------- Liber Cleri Detail Linked to person: Bridges, Johannes 1577-1590 View Full Liber Cleri Record CCEd Record ID: 83277 Close Window Evidence Cleric Detail Surname Bridges Forename Johannes Title Magister Qualification: MA Event Type Date: 24/9/1584 Office/Status: Rector Location: Harbaldowne / Source CCA, DCb Z.3.12. (Liber Cleri): 1584 Ordinary / Jurisdiction Archdeacon of Canterbury/Canterbury Description preacher --------------------- Vacancy Evidence Record Linked to person: Bridges, Johannes 1577-1590 CCEd Record ID: 53525 Close Window Evidence Cleric Detail Surname Bridges Forename John Title Qualification University College Year Event Type Reason natural death Date 6/3/1590 Office/Status: Rector Clerical Status Location: Snave// Source LPL, Whitgift's Register, vol. 1 (Register) Ordinary / Jurisdiction Whitgift, John/Canterbury Province 1583-1604 Description -------------------------- Vacancy Evidence Record Linked to person: Bridges, Johannes 1577-1590 CCEd Record ID: 53508 Close Window Evidence Cleric Detail Surname Bridges Forename John Title Qualification MA University College Year Event Type Reason: resignation Date 5/9/1590 Office/Status: Perpetual Vicar Clerical Status Location: Hearne// Source LPL, Whitgift's Register, vol. 1 (Register) Ordinary / Jurisdiction Whitgift, John/Canterbury Province 1583-1604	BRYDGES AKA BRIDGES, Reverend John (I8360)
2516	Ospringe Street, 55 years Aged 75 on death registration. There is another Mary Aylett that was buried in Ospringe on 24 May 1846. 1841 Faversham District 7, Ospringe Lane Henry Aylett, 47 blind yes Mary, 45 yes Edward 17 ag lab yes Mary Ann 15 yes Sarah 12 yes Catharine 6, yes Charles 2, yes 1851 Faversham District 4b, ospringe lane Mary Aylett, head, widow, 58, a mangle, born Ospringe Catherine Aylett, daughter, unm, 15, at home, born Faversham Charles Aylett, son, 12, scholar, born Faversham 1851 Faversham ED4b Household 6 Ospringe lane Henry Aylett, head, mar, 33, gardener, born Rochester Harriett Aylett, wife, mar, 28, born Boughton Henry A. Aylett, son, 7, born Ospringe Sarah Jane Aylett, daugh 6, born Faversham Alice Aylett, daug, 2, born Faversham Fanny Aylett, daugh 1, born Faversham next door is Thomas Aylett, mar 30, born Rochester with his family 1861 Faversham without, ED 11b, Wallers Row, Household Sch. #4 Mary Aylett, head, widow. 67, formerly servant, born Ospringe Charles Aylett, son, mar, 23, ag labourer, born Faversham Mary Ann Aylett, d-i-l, mar, 22, born St. Dunstans, Cby Mary Jane Aylett, granddaug. un 18 months, born Faversham 1861 ED11 Sch. 30, Wallers Row Henry Aylett, head, widow, 41, born Rochester Henry Aylett, son, 16, born Faversham 1861 Union Workhouse Alice Aylett, pauper, 11, born Faversham in Workhouse Jane Aylett, 14, born Faversham in workhouse Fanny Aylett, 9, born Faversham in workhouse Rochester St. Nicholas Elliott Henry c 29 Mar 1818 Henry/Mary, labourer Elliott John c 8 Aug 1819 Henry/Mary, horsekeeper Eliot Thomas c 21 Jan 1821 Henry/Mary, labourer SURNAME GIVEN NAME EVT DATE YEAR PARENTS/SPOUSE PLACE SOURCE AYLETT Charles C 02 Sep 1838 Henry/Mary Faversham BT, AD	MILSTED, Mary (I2724)
2517	Other children: Spouse & Children Alice Annie Isabel Margaret Irvine 1881–1968 Clifford Morton Baldock 1907–1991 Edward Hector Baldock 1909–2005 Vivienne Olive Baldock 1909–1910 Mona Jean Baldock 1910–1998 Linda Marjorie Baldock 1911–2009 Barbara Isabel Baldock 1915–1975	BALDOCK, Morton Edwin (I16015)
2518	Other possible children: Births Sep 1941 (>99%) Brand Iris Scott Bury St.E. 4a 1907 Scan available - click to view Births Mar 1943 (>99%) Brand Rita Scott Bury St.E. 4a 1522 Scan available - click to view Births Jun 1944 (>99%) Brand June Scott Bury St.E. 4a 1750 Scan available - click to view Births Sep 1946 (>99%) Brand Susan Scott Newmarket 4b 1659 Scan available - click to view Births Dec 1947 (>99%) Brand Michael J Scott Newmarket 4b 1485 Scan available - click to view Births Mar 1951 (>99%) BRAND Sally SCOTT Newmarket 4b 1259 Scan available - click to view Births Mar 1954 (>99%) Brand Stephen Scott Newmarket 4b 1297	SCOTT, Daisy (I17597)
2519	Otto (or Oddo) (c. 851 – 30 November 912), called the Illustrious (der Erlauchte) by later authors, was the Duke of Saxony from 880 to his death. He was the younger son of Duke Liudolf of Saxony and his wife Oda of Billung, and succeeded his brother Bruno as duke after the latter's death in battle in 880. His family, named after his father, is called the Liudolfing, after the accession of his grandson Emperor Otto I also the Ottonian dynasty. By a charter of King Louis the Younger to Gandersheim Abbey dated 26 January 877, the pago Suththuringa (region of South Thuringia) is described as in comitatu Ottonis (in Otto's county). In a charter of 28 January 897, Otto is described as marchio and the pago Eichesfelden (Eichsfeld) is now found to be within his county (march). He was also the lay abbot of Hersfeld Abbey in 908. He was described as magni ducis Oddonis (great duke Otto) by Widukind of Corvey when describing the marriage of his sister, Liutgard, to King Louis. Otto rarely left Saxony. He was a regional prince and his overlords, Louis the Younger and Emperor Arnulf of Carinthia, with both of whom he was on good terms, rarely interfered in Saxony. In Saxony, Otto was king in practice and he established himself as tributary ruler over the neighbouring Slav tribes, such as the Daleminzi. According to Widukind of Corvey, Otto was offered the kingship of East Francia after the death of Louis the Child in 911, but did not accept it on account of his advanced age, instead suggesting Conrad of Franconia. The truthfulness of this report is considered doubtful.[1] Otto's wife was Hathui of Babenberg (Hedwiga, †903), daughter of Henry of Franconia. Otto was and is buried in the church of Gandersheim Abbey. He had two sons, Thankmar and Liudolf, who predeceased him, but his third son Henry succeeded him as duke of Saxony and was later elected king. His daughter Oda married the Carolingian King Zwentibold of Lotharingia. Sources: Reuter, Timothy. Germany in the Early Middle Ages 800–1056. New York: Longman, 1991.	Otto I Duke of Saxony (I11743)
2520	Our Thomas Nutt, Senior was born circa 1745, based on the age recorded on his burial. He married Mary Herman on 21 October 1770 at Faversham after publication of banns. Thomas was described as being "of Faversham" but no christening for him appears in any of the church registers. There is no direct evidence of Thomas' occupation however I suspect that he was somehow involved in the fishing industry. His sons were variously a fisherman, dredger, and mariner. During 1757 an Edward Nutt was assessed as both owner and occupier of property on Court and Abbey Streets in Faversham. Unfortunately, there is an almost 20-year gap in the land tax assessments between 1762 and 1780 so it is impossible to determine from that source if a later assessment included this Edward Nutt or if the property that he had occupied eventually flowed through to our Thomas. Similarly, an Ann Nutt married a Thomas Allen during 1779 at Faversham. All of the known children of that couple were christened at Selling, the native parish of Thomas Allen. This Ann was born circa 1759 and could possibly be the daughter of the unidentified John Nutt. Alternatively, she may be a younger sister of our Thomas Nutt, senior. The next assessment in Faversham is that of Thomas Nutt as tenant of Richard Pratt during the years 1780 through 1782. As of 30 May 1783, however, Thomas has purchased property which he continued to own and occupy through 1793. There was also a John Nutt who was buried at Faversham during 1788 at the age of 59 years (bc 1729). It is quite possible that John was an uncle or older brother of our Thomas, Senior. Again, no christening has been found in Faversham or neighbouring parishes for John. Thomas, Senior, rented a large tract of property in Ospringe between 1790 and 1794 from the Earl of Guildford. That property was assessed at GB32 per year and must have been some form of warehouse operation. Again, a gap in the land tax assessment records occurrs from 1793 to 1831. From the manorial records for the manor of Faversham in 1802 Thomas Nutt appeared before the court to bring his tenure of manorial holdings into good standing. He was recorded as being both owner and occupier since 1782 of a messuage and premises in Abbey Street East in the town. Occupiers of adjacent property, two on Abbey Street and two in Court Street "or the passage behind" were recorded as James Nutt, Matthew Harmon, John Harmon and Willson Stephen Admans. James Nutt we know is the son of Thomas. Matthew and John Harmon are also related by marriage as brothers-in-law of Thomas Nutt. I have not, however, determined any relationship between the Admans fellow and either the Harmon or Nutt families. The further good standing of Thomas Nutt and his son, Thomas, is evidenced by the fact that both were nominated as burgesses of Faversham and appear on the burgess rolls from 1837 through 1840. As a burgess of the town both Thomas, Senior and Thomas, Junior were free men and therefor entitled to vote. The rated property which qualified both of them as burgesses was located on Abbey Street. A brief note appeared in the manorial court records during 1839, 1840 and 1843 indicating that a John Pay was purchaser of the holdings of Thomas Nutt, Senior. Unfortunately, the entries in 1839 and 1840 were only very brief and no further details were provided. A full entry was recorded in the court during 1841 so it is quite curious why mention needed to be made again during 1843 of the transaction. From the files of Arthur Percival, M.B.E., M.A. D.Litt., F.S.A., of the Faversham Fleur de-lis Heritage Centre, the following information was received by letter dated 1 September 2000 addressed to Janet M. Epps, (a copy of which was forwarded to me by Janet), concerning this Thomas Nutt: "Thomas Nutt (1745-1839) paid a rate on a house on the east side of Abbey Street on 20 December 1785. He was also a party to a lease (April 1782) which related to 93-94 Abbey Street and 11-12 Oyster Court (at the rear of 93-4). Whether he actually lived in any of these I cannot say, but the probability is that he lived at either 93 or 94 Abbey Street - one of them, at least, a medieval timber-framed building which still survives. He was a dredger (ie oyster dredger) according to a 1794 directory. Canterbury Cathedral Archives, Call #CCA-DCc-ChAnt/W/217 Probate with will and codicil annexed Date 2 May 1655 Date 12 Mar 1653 Description Will, testament and codicil of Margaret Bargrave of St Mildred's parish, Canterbury, widow, dated 20 Fen [?] and 12 Mar 1653. She wishes to be buried in St Mildred's church, in the grave of her first husband. Bequests to: Margaret Wilkins, daughter of George Wilkins, gent, deceased; Edward Alexander and Jane Alexander, son and daughter of Edward Alexander deceased, the testarix's cousin; Mr Lee, minister of St Mildred's church; Katherine and Elizabeth Smith, the testatrix's kinswomen and William Smith, their brother; John Polhill and Thomas Polhill, sons of John Polhill, esq, the testatrix's cousins; Mr William Somner, the testatrix's 'very loving friend'; Thomas Courthop, the testatrix's friend; William Courthop, son of Thomas Courthop; Margaret Bossell, wife of - Bossell [blank in document] of St Dunstan's, Canterbury; John Nutt and Thomas Stonestreet, the testatrix's cousins; Judith Rucke, wife of Laurence Rucke. Bequests are of money, rings and lands in Wye and Brook in the names of Thomas Courthop, William Somner and Edward Pyard, gent. Provision for distribution of money to the poor. She appoints William Somner her executor. The codicil revokes the legacies to Edward and Jane Alexander and leaves a bequest to Jane Alexander, their mother. Proved before the judges for the probate of wills and granting of administrations on 2 May 1655. Signatures of Mark Cottle, B Sankey and W Longmore. Witnesses to the will: Edward Pyard; Elizabeth Richardson Witnesses to the codicil: Elizabeth Richardson; Martha Richardson PhysicalDescription Parchment, 2mm, attached by seal tag, slightly dirty PubNote Calendared in C E Woodruff (ed), Sede vacante wills (Kent Archaeological Society, Canterbury, 1914), p4 Noted in Historical Manuscripts Commission Fifth Report (London, 1876), Appendix, p460 In Leysdown parish, Sheppey is NUTS, as it is vulgarly called, but in antient courtrolls written Notts, is a small manor in this parish, which was so named from a family of that name owners of it, who continued so for several generations; but about the beginning of king Edward IV.'s reign it was alienated from thence to Bartholomew, a family possessed of much land about Linsted, Throwley, and other places in that neighbourhood; they implanted their name on part of this estate, which from thenceforward was called Bartholomew's farm, and continued proprietors of it till the reign of Henry VII. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/survey-kent/vol6/pp263-271 1745 Thomas Nutt, Sr. born 1756 Edward Nutt marries Elizabeth Haywood, she widow Aug 16 at Minster Sheppey 1757 Edward Nutt assessed as owner/occupier of Court and Abbey Streets 1770 Oct 21 Thomas Nutt, St. married Mary Herman 1779 Ann Nutt married Thomas Allen at Selling 1780 Thomas Nutt tenant of Richard Pratt 1782 April Thomas Nutt Sr. party to a lease of 93-94 Abbey Street and 11-12 Oyster Court (behind Abbey Street property 1782 July 1 Elizabeth Nutt buried at Faversham (no age recorded but I now suspect that this was wife of Edward Nutt whom she married at Minster Sheppey 1783 Thomas Nutt purchases property 1785 Thomas Nutt pays rates on property on east side of Abbey Street Dec 20 1788 John Nutt buried age 59 (bc 1729) [Is this man's name incorrectly recorded? There appears to be no burial for an Edward Nutt at Faversham, yet it appears that his wife was buried there. Also, there is no record of a John Nutt at Faversham, only Edward Nutt appears in the tax rolls. 1790 Thomas Nutt, Sr. rents property in Ospringe from Earl of Guildford through to 1794 1794 Thomas Nutt, Sr. appears in Faversham directory 1802 Thomas Nutt, Sr. appears before Manorial Court to bring holdings into good standing Abbey Street East occupiers of adjacent property were James Nutt, Matthew Harmon and John Harmon 1837 Thomas Nutt, Sr. and Jr. appear on burgess rolls up to 1840 1839 John Pay appears before manorial court as purchaser of property of Thomas Nutt, Sr., repeated again in 1840, 1841 and 1843	NUTT, Thomas (I2892)
2521	Over the evolution of several census William and Matilda Packer have shownsome interesting circumstances:1851 Matilda, at age 24, was unmarried and living at home with her mother,Sarah (nee Page) at 12 Ospringe Road, Victoria Place, Faversham. With themwere Matilda's other female siblings - Emma, aged 19, Sarah aged 10 andRebecca aged 8. William Packer and Matilda married on 27 September 1851 at Ospringe parish church. He was described as being of full age, a bachelor and basketmaker living on Ospringe Street. His father was recorded as James Packer, also a basketmaker. Matilda was described as being of full age, a spinster living on Ospringe Street. Her father was recorded as being Thomas William Gregory a mariner. Witnesses were William Cook and John Lott, the latter of whom was a churchwarden at Ospringe.1861 Matilda and William are married, living at 46 Market Place, Faversham.With them are Rebecca Gregory, listed as sister unmarried and 18, a schoolteacher; and Ellen Gregory, also listed as sister unmarried, aged 11.According to the 1851 census, the only Ellen Gregory aged about 1 year oldis the daughter and sole child of Peter Page Gregory and Sarah Ann (neeTwist). Peter Page Gregory was the brother of Matilda and he was buried atFaversham on 6 February 1853. I have not followed up what became of hiswife and it may be that she also had died. In any event, the description ofEllen Gregory in 1861 would have been inaccurate. She should have beenshown as a niece in the household. Rebecca Gregory eventually married a manby the name of C. R. Freeman and moved to Rolvenden (1881 census). EmmaGregory (the one referred to in 1851 above) also moved out to Rolvenden by1891 and was living with the Freemans.In 1871 Ellen Gregory is shown as the daughter of William and MatildaPacker, aged 21 and an assistant in William's basket making business. Thefamily lived at 5 Market Place, Faversham. At that time William alsoemployed 2 men and 1 boy. This description of Ellen being a daughter wouldcertainly throw the unsuspecting ancestor hunter completely off the trail ifthey had failed to look at previous census. Ellen Gregory married FrederickJohn Ralph on 6 June 1876 and went on to have seven children of her own oneof whom was named Kathleen Matilda.In 1881 Mary A. Gregory was living with Matilda and William. In trying to answer the question of which Mary A. this is in 1881 we have to look at Matilda's own siblings: Matilda was chr.13 Apr 1827 at Faversham the third of 10 children (9 surviving). AmongstMatilda's siblings were two brothers who each had a Mary Ann, as follows:1) Thomas William, Jr. married Mary Ann Cowdrey on 9 October 1853 and hadthree children. The first child, Ellen was christened curing 1856 but theremaining two children - Mary Ann and Caroline Olive - were not christeneduntil the same day in 1863. The 1861 census lists Mary, the wife, at 35Bridge Place, Preston with two daughters - Ella (rather than Ellen) aged 4,and Mary A. aged 1, putting her birth year circa 1859. Other than ThomasWilliam (1881 census shipmaster on board the "Collingwood" at Teynham) theremainder of this family seems to vanish during 1881. Thomas William diedduring the 1st quarter of 1889 and no other family is readily evident in theFaversham area during 1891.2) John married Mary Ann Brenchley circa 1855. They had four children oneof which was a Mary Ann born during 1861 but after the day of the 1861census. This Mary Ann is missing from the household in 1881 leaving at herhome only her mother Mary A. (nee Brenchley) and her brother John R.. Herother brother, William George was on board the "Walter" during the time ofthe 1881 census. Her sister, Ella was staying with their aunt, Sarah AnnGutridge (nee Gregory - another of Matilda's sisters) during 1881.Although I suspect that the Mary A. Gregory is the daughter of John (#2above) I have no real substance with which to back up that assumption.A last little tidbit concerning William and Matilda Packer comes from themanorial court rolls: During 1896 an Emma Gregory took over copyholdproperty previously belonging to William Packer. Unfortunately, I did notrecord this in full detail fully expecting to get back to it to copy itbefore the film was returned to Salt Lake. Subsequently, during 1898 SarahAnn Gutridge appeared before the manorial court to request admittance to themanor property on the west side of Court Street, being #5 Market Place,Faversham, and further described as having been "late the estate of WilliamPacker, deceased who devised to his widow, now deceased, who by Will devisedto Sarah Ann Gutridge". Relief paid was 8 pence - 4 being the relief thatshould have been paid upon William's death and 4 being the relief due at thetime Sarah Ann took over the property. Sarah Ann performed her fealty andwas admitted tenant of the property at #5 Market Place. Sarah Ann, you willremember, was one of Matilda's sisters.	GREGORY, Matilda (I2419)
2522	OWLETT, Thomas "Tommy"; 85; Toronto ON; Toronto Star; 2003-07-16*JB	OWLETT, Thomas (I6868)
2523	PACKARD (Doreen Ruth): Passed away peacefully at kerry Lodge, Katanning, Sunday 4.9.2011, aged 86 years. Loved wife of Walter (dec). Loved Mum of Terry and Eileen, Judy and Mal, Garry and Sue. Nan of 20 grand... ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED 5th Sep, 2011	SCHUBERT, Doreen (I19551)
2524	At least one living or private individual is linked to this note - Details withheld.	Living (I19552)
2525	PACKARD , Doreen Ruth . Died 4 September 2011 - No headstone @ 24/5/2010 PACKARD , Walter John. Husband of Doreenfather of Terry, Eileen, Judith, Malcolm, Garry and Susanne. 16 Jul 1988 aged 68	PACKARD, Walter John (I19579)
2526	page damaged on baptism, baptism date from Tylers extracts.	RIGDEN, Margaret (I14026)
2527	Page in register for this burial is very darkened and there is one year missing between 1600/01 and 1603/4 so dates are almost impossible to determine. Burial date taken from Tyler's extracts.	RIGDEN, Thomas (I14025)
2528	Pam Bartram bartrampam@hotmail.com Alice Ruck/Abraham DeSoiza she wrote on Nov 9 Hi. My great great grandparents were Alice and Abraham,There youngest son Rueben was my great grandfather who died in 1924.He had two sons Louis and Joseph Frederick who was my grandfather and whom I remember as he died in 1956 when I was 10.My mother was Matilda Eliza an only child. I have done some research into Abraham’s family who lived in Derby and Hull,but have not yet found a marriage record for Alice and Abraham.Any information about them would be appreciated.Your Ruck Family Tree is very impressive. Best wishes. Terry Bartram ------------------------------------- Then Terry Bartram wrote again from bartramterence@hotmail.co.uk Hello, Terry, Alice Ruck's marriage to Abraham DeSoiza has been a puzzle that I have not been able to solve. Most likely the marriage took place in London at a non-conformist church or chapel, which is either no longer standing or the registers are among those destroyed during WWII bombing. It was another researcher who wrote to me many years ago who advised that Alice Ruck had married Abraham. Now, turning to Alice's parents, John Ruck and Alice Miller nee Russell. Immediately you will notice that I now have Alice's maiden surname and this should indicate that the information on my website is quite out-dated. John Ruck (who married Alice Miller) was initially thought to be the son of John Ruck and Frances Launcefield of Throwley. But, then another researcher indicated that he tied the son, John, of that John Ruck, to a marriage to an Elizabeth Ann Winder at Lenham. So, for a very long time John Ruck (son of John Ruck and Frances Launcefield) was left to sit in my tree as having married both women as no burial for Alice formerly Miller nee Russell could be found in Kent. Consequently, it was surmised that Alice had died somewhere in London as the family of John Ruck and Elizabeth Ann Winder were all born at London. Since those early days my research into the Ruck family has advanced significantly. There are still many unresolved conflicts within various members of the larger family. New information of many more births, baptisms, marriages, deaths and burials is slowly shaking up the larger tree and its connections. One of the more recent trains of thought has been about John Ruck and Alice Miller nee Russell and whether or not that John fits with John the son of John Ruck and Frances Launcefield. In a word, I now don't believe that he does. This John Ruck who married Alice Miller nee Russell I do not now think that he was the son of John Ruck and Frances Launcefield as their son John was apprenticed by his father in 1795 for a period of 7 years as a cooper at London. That John's apprenticeship would not have finished until 1802 and generally, apprentices were not permitted to marry before they completed their apprenticeship. Additionally, even if this John had been that John and apprenticed for only 4 years he would have been able to sign his name in the marriage register at Charing. The marriage register at Charing shows that John Ruck signed with an X as did Alice Miller. So, this further supports my suspicions that John who married Alice Russell is not the John Ruck who married Elizabeth Ann Winder. Another point is that the marriage of John Ruck and Elizabeth Ann Winder states that John Ruck was of Lambeth. The apprenticeship would have been completed in 1802, a few years before his marriage to Elizabeth Ann Winder and most likely those intervening years would have been filled with making his living and settling in to a stable life. Furthermore, the fact that the marriage at Lenham to Elizabeth Ann Winder indicates that John Ruck was of Lambeth would also tie in with his apprenticeship at London. The last piece of evidence that the two John Rucks are separate individuals came with the advancement of readily available census. John Ruck born at Throwley and married to Elizabeth Ann Winder appears in 1841 at Lewisham, Sydenham Hill and in 1851 at Croyden, Surrey. In 1841 he is recorded as a merchant and in 1851 as a retired wine merchant. Simultaneously, in 1841 at Charing are John Ruck and Alice, aged 70 and 80, respectively with no one else in their household. This fact rather pointedly demonstrates that the two John's are separate people. So, then, if the John Ruck (son of John Ruck and Frances Launcefield) is otherwise demonstrated to be the husband of Elizabeth Ann Winder, who then is the John Ruck who married Alice Miller nee Russell? So, then, with this deeper research into John Ruck's appeared two marriages, the picture is emerging that there must have been another John Ruck of a similar age who could possibly fit the person who could have married Alice Miller nee Russell. There has always been one very nagging point about this marriage: The 1840 census revealed that there was a large age disparity between John and Alice, with him being about 10 years her junior. She was a widow. He was a bachelor. What would a bachelor who apparently couldn't sign his name was doing marrying a widow about 10 years older than himself? With the shakeup of my own ancestral Ruck line I was forced to develop the Ruck family at Elham. I still do not have the entire group of Rucks emanating from Elham completed. However, I have discovered that there was an illegitimate John Ruck born to Ann Ruck at Elham on 17 Nov 1776. I have also tracked down the marriages and/or burials of every other John Ruck in Kent. After that exercise this John (son of Ann) remains as the only other possible fit for John Ruck who married Alice Miller nee Russell. I have not had the benefit of being able to search for Bastardy examinations or Parish Overseer Accounts for Ann or her son John. Once the world returns to normal this will be one of the lines of research I will be picking up. Certainly, this John appears to be a fit for the father of Alice Ruck. He had extended family in the Charing and Throwley area and may even have gone to work for John the elder at Throwley as that John's own son would have been away in London on his apprenticeship. He was illegitimate, which would explain why his first wife was much older than he and a widow and that widow had four children from her previous marriage. Lastly, there is no burial at Elham for this John Ruck. The next step was to determine who the Ann Ruck was. Thanks to the shakeup of my own tree which saw my Thomas Ruck, Sr. being reassigned as the illegitimate son of Mary Ruck of Elham, I was made aware that Mary's brother, Richard had gone off to Leeds, Kent to follow the trade of carpentry. That same Richard had a daughter named Ann chr. 1 May 1756 at Leeds from his second marriage to Ann Skinner. Richard had been baptised at Elham on 21 March 1707/08. The father of my Thomas Ruck was one Edward Rigden who was an apprentice of Richard Ruck of Leeds. So, it would make perfect sense for Richard to send his own daughter back to Elham to have her child as there was a large immediate family at Elham who could help and care for Ann during her pregnancy. We still end up back at John Ruck and Margaret, circa 1500s at Boughton-under-Blean, just along a different path. Alice RUCK would have been my 3rd cousin 4 times removed. Our common ancestors are John RUCK and Elizabeth BEANE of Elham. I'm sending along the new pedigree of Alice Ruck, based on the currently state of research and findings. If you have any questions, please do write. I hope this helps, although I cannot provide any details of the marriage of Alice Ruck to Abraham DeSoiza.	RUCK, Alice (I5445)
2529	Parentage of Elizabeth BEAUCHAMP is drawn from [S6] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume II, page 47. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage.	BEAUCHAMP, Elizabeth (I15226)
2530	Parents described as being of the parish of Week St. Germans on this christening.	WHITE, Arthur (I883)
2531	Parents described as living at 22 Abbey Brickfields, father a labourer on baptism.	OWLETT, Alfred John (I11234)
2532	Parents residing on Becket Street. Medal Card of Douglas, George Henry Place of Birth: Faversham Date of Birth:... Ordering and viewing options £3.50 Download size approximately 0.5 MB. Download format PDF Add to basket More ways to view this record Reference: BT 351/1/37497 Description: Medal Card of Douglas, George Henry Place of Birth: Faversham Date of Birth: 1894 Date: [1914-1925] Held by: The National Archives, Kew Legal status: Public Record(s) Language: English Creator: Registrar General of Shipping and Seamen, 1872-1992 Closure status: Open Document, Open Description Douglass, George Henry Date of birth: 1894 BT 351/1/37468 Maritime medal record	DOUGLAS, George Henry (I7580)
2533	PARENTS/SPOUSE he bachelor, 24, wheelwright, residing Upleese, father William Stimson, bailiff and she spinster, 20, no occupation, residing St. John's Road, father Henry Aylett, haytrusser. Wit: Henry Arthur Aylett, Sarah Jane Aylett	Family (F5904)
2534	PARENTS/SPOUSE Gent, bat., 27, of Faversham & Elizabeth Ruck, sp., 26, at St. Mary Bredin Canterbury. Bond: William Allen, Gent of Faversham	Family (F2056)
2535	PARENTS/SPOUSE he bat., of this parish, she spinster of Dunkirk	Family (F1218)
2536	PARENTS/SPOUSE Mr. of Canterbury & Mrs. she of Molash - lic	Family (F2462)
2537	Parish register entry reads: Page 50 [image 52 on FindMyPast https://search.findmypast.co.uk/record/browse?id=GBPRS/DEV/005843089/00052] "8th Nov No. 397, child's name James, parents' names Maria Stannin [this last name crossed out], surname Dawe, residence Beaworthy, occupation of parent single woman. Altered by me Jan. 10 '58" Age on burial recorded as 2 months.	DAWE, James ^ (I20357)
2538	Parish Register: Marriages at St. Edward's, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England: Lawrence Ruck, of Ospringe, co. Kent, gent., & Amy Thompson, of Cambridge, in Trinity Hall Chapel, lic. 16 Sep 1721	Family (F508)
2539	passed away while visiting her sons Albert & Arthur	PILCHER, Emma Frances (I10450)
2540	Paterfamilias	OXENBRIDGE, Robert (I19184)
2541	Paterfamilias on burial.	BACK, Anthony (I7970)
2542	At least one living or private individual is linked to this note - Details withheld.	Living (I2390)
2543	Patricia RIN 19806 and Susan Dara YOUNG are 6th cousins. Their common ancestors are John MILSTED and Mary SHERLOCK.	Patricia (I19806)
2544	PAY , Phyllis , C , Year of Marriage: 1948 Entry Number: 147 Register: CO3X4(Aylesford) Location: Kent County Council P.C Kill Tel: (01233) 812301 - Text Number 151 Little Chequers, Wye, Ashford, TN25 5DU -	PAY, Phyllis Christina (I10191)
2545	PCC Will on ancestry.com for Henry Monger 1805 Isle of Thanet: to Henry Monger son of John Monger of Faversham to George ibid to William ibid to John ibid to Edward ibid to Stephen ibid Also Will for his wife, Ann is there, too, 1808. She left everything to her brother-in-law, Edward Browning. GEDCOM ID#: 9054143 : P1423 Donor Name: Email: rantich6@bigpond.com.au Kit Number: A738614 Name: donna cowell Email: rantich6@bigpond.com.au Elizabeth RUCK (RACK) GEDmatch Ref: 9054143 : P1423 Born: 22 May 1774, Faversham, Kent, England Died: 17 Jan 1844, Faversham, Kent, England Union with: John Monger b. 1 Jan 1772 ? christening, d. abt 1842 Children: +Stephen Monger (b. 21 Jun 1806, d. 8 Jul 1870) Mary Elizabeth Monger (b. 1803, d. Unknown) Thomas Monger (b. 1816, d. 1817) James MONGER (b. 1808, d. 1851) Edward Monger (b. 1799, d. 1817) William Samuel Monger (b. 30 May 1800, d. 1866) John Henry Monger (b. 02 Feb 1800, d. 12 Nov 1867) Comparing Kit PV4445865 (Susan Young) [FTDNA V1] and A738614 (donna cowell) [Migration - F2 - A] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 2 120,247,486 122,601,302 3.5 295 2 134,623,534 138,427,264 3.0 514 3 189,443,562 190,787,990 3.3 281 4 83,411,635 85,428,178 3.1 297 10 3,313,456 4,216,511 4.6 250 15 28,096,321 29,979,340 4.7 225 Largest segment = 4.7 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 22.1 cM (0.616 Pct) 6 shared segments found for this comparison. =================================================== Comparing Kit T487091 (Susan Young for Lillian Penny) [Migration - F2 - T] and A738614 (donna cowell) [Migration - F2 - A] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 2 72,325,404 74,970,921 3.5 218 2 134,638,499 138,427,264 3.0 513 3 131,484,558 133,572,319 3.2 322 3 147,623,914 149,101,811 3.0 233 11 57,976,907 61,505,168 3.0 377 11 63,487,386 67,748,817 3.2 326 Largest segment = 3.5 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 18.9 cM (0.527 Pct) 6 shared segments found for this comparison. ================================================================== Lavinia HILLS GEDmatch Ref: 7815705 : P4480 Born: abt 1841, Maidstone, Kent, England GEDCOM ID#: 7815705 : P4480 Donor Name: Bonita Naylor Family Tree Email: bonniebuster53@me.com Kit Number: A563094 Name: Bonnie Naylor Email: bonniebuster53@me.com Comparing Kit T487091 (Susan Young for Lillian Penny) [Migration - F2 - T] and A563094 (Bonnie Naylor) [Migration - F2 - A] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 9 138,359,002 139,387,846 3.4 253 10 98,087 1,831,930 3.6 499 13 31,927,543 33,746,750 3.3 479 14 23,284,572 24,247,710 3.2 280 15 43,826,557 50,007,348 5.9 1,085 15 92,159,829 93,441,907 4.7 530 18 60,279,464 62,460,065 4.3 570 19 53,571,306 54,296,771 3.9 226 22 18,377,716 19,646,034 3.7 284 Largest segment = 5.9 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 36.0 cM (1.003 Pct) 9 shared segments found for this comparison. Comparing Kit PV4445865 (Susan Young) [FTDNA V1] and A563094 (*Bonnie Naylor) [Migration - F2 - A] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 4 169,717,641 173,677,193 4.0 604 13 31,987,504 33,679,940 3.1 423 18 6,956,194 8,110,805 5.6 362 20 63,799 714,462 3.3 223 20 53,421,451 55,148,808 3.7 452 20 56,161,598 57,127,468 3.6 329 Largest segment = 5.6 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 23.2 cM (0.647 Pct) 6 shared segments found for this comparison. ==================================================================== Francis HILLS GEDmatch Ref: 3112330 : I70034 Born: ABT 1803, Maidstone, Kent, England GEDCOM ID#: 3112330 : I70034 Donor Name: Janet Payne Email: purrfectlyhappyisme@gmail.com Kit Number: M127276 Name: Ken Nelson Email: purrfectlyhappyisme@gmail.com Kit Number: ZK9522251 Name: Janet Payne Email: purrfectlyhappyisme@gmail.com Kit Number: ER492870C1 Name: Ken Nelson Email: purrfectlyhappyisme@gmail.com Kit Number: EA1337274 Name: Gene Nelson Email: purrfectlyhappyisme@gmail.com Comparing Kit T487091 (Susan Young for Lillian Penny) [Migration - F2 - T] and M127276 (Ken Nelson) [Migration - V4 - M] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 4 70,718,282 74,275,515 3.1 232 7 42,615,974 45,190,414 3.3 246 17 55,522,450 59,315,145 3.9 287 Largest segment = 3.9 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 10.2 cM (0.285 Pct) Comparing Kit PV4445865 (Susan Young) [FTDNA V1] and M127276 (Ken Nelson) [Migration - V4 - M] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 3 182,336,422 185,613,272 6.0 380 4 38,167,985 40,260,379 3.5 249 9 2,596,783 3,908,403 3.2 231 12 77,880,974 81,007,527 4.1 274 Largest segment = 6.0 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 16.7 cM (0.465 Pct) Comparing Kit T487091 (Susan Young for Lillian Penny) [Migration - F2 - T] and ZK9522251 (Janet Payne) [AncestryDNA] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 2 121,813,700 124,675,291 3.4 546 8 81,161,499 84,652,949 3.1 579 12 20,597,977 22,890,805 3.5 786 15 27,756,585 29,431,821 5.2 270 17 53,398,459 55,181,938 4.2 467 18 7,417,189 8,413,996 4.4 288 Largest segment = 5.2 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 23.7 cM (0.662 Pct) 6 shared segments found for this comparison. Comparing Kit PV4445865 (Susan Young) [FTDNA V1] and ZK9522251 (Janet Payne) [AncestryDNA] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 2 106,938,041 109,819,824 3.1 539 5 8,145,014 9,562,434 3.0 398 6 1,696,841 2,693,442 3.1 262 16 1,217,549 2,415,691 3.1 276 21 43,726,490 45,699,404 3.7 567 22 18,495,470 19,730,592 3.3 276 Largest segment = 3.7 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 19.2 cM (0.535 Pct) 6 shared segments found for this comparison. Comparing Kit T487091 (Susan Young for Lillian Penny) [Migration - F2 - T] and EA1337274 (Gene Nelson) [Family Tree DNA] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 2 193,331,208 199,697,571 4.2 845 6 167,177,422 168,389,858 3.9 266 10 131,054,677 132,046,689 3.6 308 11 129,507,034 130,701,762 3.1 359 12 20,597,977 22,890,805 3.5 811 15 27,756,585 29,431,821 5.2 278 17 55,681,549 59,330,768 3.6 554 18 6,972,144 8,357,499 6.5 460 Largest segment = 6.5 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 33.6 cM (0.938 Pct) Comparing Kit PV4445865 (Susan Young) [FTDNA V1] and EA1337274 (Gene Nelson) [Family Tree DNA] Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 3.0 cM Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment. Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs 2 131,103,635 133,696,554 3.6 352 6 97,069,838 101,094,554 3.0 667 10 131,054,677 131,940,668 3.3 260 12 19,835,641 22,031,887 3.8 885 17 14,217,972 14,946,601 4.0 369 21 43,726,490 45,699,404 3.7 585 Largest segment = 4.0 cM Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 21.3 cM (0.595 Pct) 6 shared segments found for this comparison.	MONGER, John 'Edward' (I3326)
2546	Pedigree for Denne in Berry's work indicates that this Richard was still living in 1829 aged 97 years.	RUCK, Richard (I3425)
2547	At least one living or private individual is linked to this note - Details withheld.	Living (I13229)
2548	PENHALIGON, ALICE MARTIN GEORGE GRO Reference: 1858 M Quarter in OF BODMIN Volume 05C Page 111	PENHALIGON, Alice Martin (I17798)
2549	PENHALIGON, ANNIE LOUISA GEORGE GRO Reference: 1871 M Quarter in OF BODMIN Volume 05C Page 91	PENHALIGON, Annie Louisa (I17799)
2550	PENHALIGON, EDITH BICKLE GEORGE GRO Reference: 1859 J Quarter in OF BODMIN Volume 05C Page 119	PENHALIGON, Edith Bickle (I17795)

Maintained by County Administrator. | Data Protection Policy.

Copyright 2009-2022. The research information and family data found in the Kent Online Parish Clerks, Kent's Family Garden, is the sole and exclusive copyright of the respective owners of the individual family databases. All rights are reserved. No authorization or permission is given to distribute any of the information found here to any parties in any format at any time whatsoever. Information and data posted here is for the sole and personal use of the individual researching any of the individuals or families found here. Commercial use or distribution is strictly forbidden.