|
|
 |
|
1833 -
-
Name |
Susan WARD |
Born |
1833 |
Faversham, Kent, England |
Gender |
Female |
Person ID |
I2300 |
Young Kent Ancestors |
Last Modified |
28 Dec 2021 |
Family 1 |
John GREGORY, c. 10 Apr 1825, Davington, Kent, England , bur. 3 May 1854, Faversham, Kent, England (Age ~ 29 years) |
Married |
25 Dec 1848 |
Faversham, Kent, England [2] |
Children |
| 1. Jane ^ GREGORY, c. 9 Dec 1849, Faversham, Kent, England , d. June Qtr 1867, 2a, 410, Faversham, Kent, England  |
| 2. John ^ GREGORY, c. 6 Jul 1851, Faversham, Kent, England , bur. 30 Jan 1853, Faversham, Kent, England (Age ~ 1 years) |
| 3. Charles ^ GREGORY, c. 17 May 1853, Faversham, Kent, England , bur. 20 Oct 1854, Faversham, Kent, England (Age ~ 1 years) |
| 4. Elizabeth GREGORY, b. 11 Aug 1854, Faversham, Kent, England  |
|
Last Modified |
20 Mar 2022 |
Family ID |
F976 |
Group Sheet | Family Chart |
-
Sources |
- [S58] 1861 Census, England, Office of National Statistics, General Register Office, Kew, Surrey, England, (U.S.A., Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah), LDS Film #0542655, Faversham, 7 Apr 1861.
19 Court Street, "The Royal Standard", Faversham:
George Fright, head, married, 28, publican, born at Newnham
Susan Fright, wife, married, 28, born at Faversham
Jane Gregory, step-daughter, 10, born at Faversham
Elizabeth Gregory, step-daughter, 6, born at Faversham
- [S34] Parish Register, England, Kent: Church of England, Canterbury Cathedral Archives, (U.S.A., Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah), LDS Film #1886148-1886149, Entry #306, 1848, Faversham, Kent, 25 Dec 1848.
Married December 25, 1848, John Gregory, full age, dredger, residence at Faversham, father Edward Gregory, dredger, to Susan Ward, full age, in service, residence at Faversham, father William Ward, dredger. Witnesses: Edward Gregory and Daniel Gregory.
This couple immediately after his first cousin, Emery Milsted, a widower, married for the second time, Amey Savel. It begs the question if the weddings were deliberately planned for the same day and if so, that the relationship between Emery and John must have been a close one.
|
|
|
|